Adam N. Steinman

--- ---



To Say What the Law Is: Rules, Results, and the Dangers of Inferential Stare Decisis, 99 Va. L. Rev. 1737 (2013)

The Lay of the Land: Examining the Three Opinions in J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro, 63 S. C. L. Rev. 481 (2012) (invited symposium article)

Our Class Action Federalism: Erie and the Rules Enabling Act after Shady Grove, 86 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1131 (2011)

The Pleading Problem, 62 Stanford L. Rev. 1293 (2010)

What is the Erie Doctrine? (And What Does it Mean for the Contemporary Politics of Judicial Federalism?), 84 Notre Dame L. Rev. 245 (2008)

An Ounce of Prevention: Solving Some Unforeseen Problems with the Proposed Amendments to Rule 56 and the Federal Summary Judgment Process, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 230 (2008)

Reinventing Appellate Jurisdiction, 48 Boston College L. Rev. 1237 (2007)

"Less" is "More"? Textualism, Intentionalism, and a Better Solution to the Class Action Fairness Act's Appellate Deadline Riddle, 92 Iowa L. Rev. 1183 (2007)

The Irrepressible Myth of Celotex: Reconsidering Summary Judgment Burdens Twenty Years after the Trilogy, 63 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 81 (2006)

Sausage-Making, Pigs' Ears, and Congressional Expansions of Federal Jurisdiction: Exxon Mobil v. Allapattah and its Lessons for the Class Action Fairness Act, 81 Wash. L. Rev. 279 (2006)

A Constitution for Judicial Lawmaking, 65 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 545 (2004)

Reconceptualizing Federal Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners: How Should AEDPA's Standard of Review Operate After Wiliams v. Taylor?, Wis. L. Rev. 1493 (2001)


Kryptonite for CAFA, 32 REV. LITIG. ___ (forthcoming symposium)

Magic Words and the Erie Doctrine, 65 FLORIDA L. REV. FORUM 1 (2013)

The Meaning of McIntyre, 18 SOUTHWESTERN J. INT’L L. 417 (2012 Symposium)