|
Newark,
NJ—Seton Hall Law’s Center for Policy and Research
has issued a report revealing that Justice Scalia’s
dissenting opinion in Boumediene v. Bush, which
accords Guantánamo detainees the right to habeas
corpus review in federal court, cites inaccurate
information that was retracted by its original
source, the Department of Defense (DoD).
On June
12, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s
dissenting opinion on the ruling stated that “[a]t
least 30 of those prisoners hitherto released from
Guantánamo Bay have returned to the battlefield.”
The statistic was endorsed by a Senate Minority
Report issued June 26, 2007, which cites a media
outlet, CNN. CNN, in turn, named the DoD as its
source. The “30” number, however, was corrected in a
DoD press release issued in July 2007, and a DoD
document submitted to the House Foreign Relations
Committee on May 20, 2008 abandons the claim
entirely.
Professor
Mark Denbeaux, director of the Seton Hall Law Center
for Policy and Research commented, “As lawyers and
judges we have an obligation to be careful with our
facts. The notion that 30 detainees ‘returned to the
battlefield’ was disproved a year ago. It is
distressing that Justice Scalia in Boumediene was
not more careful in such an important matter,
especially since he was relying uncritically on
information that originated with a party in the case
before him.”
Justice
Scalia, The Department Of Defense, and the
Perpetuation of an Urban Legend: the Truth about
Recidivism of Released Guantánamo Detainees, the
Center’s ninth Guantánamo Report, is based entirely
on the Government’s own documents, many of which
were procured through Freedom of Information Act
suits. The prior Reports have been cited by the
Senate Armed Services Committee, the House Armed
Services Committee, the House Appropriations
Committee, and the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on
Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security; and
introduced into the Congressional Record.
In
December 2007 the Center issued The Meaning of
“Battlefield” (http://law.shu.edu/news/meaning_of_battlefield_final_121007.pdf),
which disproved the original claim decrying the fate
of 30 former Guantánamo detainees. Justice Scalia,
the Department of Defense, and the Perpetuation of
an Urban Legend, which serves as a follow-up to The
Meaning of “Battlefield,” concludes that the DoD’s
statements regarding recidivism are inconsistent
with one another other and often
contradictory—because the DoD does not have a system
for tracking the conduct, or even the whereabouts,
of released detainees.
Joshua
Denbeaux, senior fellow and co-author of the report,
stated, “A Supreme Court ruling that includes
patently inaccurate information diminishes the
Court’s credibility and tarnishes the international
reputation of the highest court in the United
States. Just as disturbing, DoD seems incapable of
producing credible information about what has
actually happened to former Guantánamo detainees. If
the decision to release detainees had been made by
the courts, rather than political appointees of DoD,
America would be safer.”
Justice Scalia, the Department of Defense, and the
Perpetuation of an Urban Legend was compiled by the
Center’s student and graduate research fellows. The
report may be read at
http://law.shu.edu/center_policyresearch/reports/urban_legend_final_63008.pdf.
Seton Hall University School of Law, New Jersey’s only private law school, and a leading law school in the New York metropolitan area, is dedicated to preparing students for the practice of law through excellence in scholarship and teaching, with a strong focus on clinical education. The Center for Policy and Research enables students to gain practical experience while engaging in research and analysis that promotes respect for the rights of individuals worldwide. The students examine primary sources pertaining to national security law and practices of the U.S. government, as well as the reliability of forensic evidence for criminal investigations and prosecution. Seton Hall Law is located in Newark, NJ and offers both day and evening degree programs. For more information, visit
http://law.shu.edu.
### |
|
|