| |
About the Teach-In
This National Teach-In is a work
in progress created by a group of
individuals organized as the
National Guantánamo Teach-In
Steering Committee. The core of
their collaboration is a virtual
teach-in which will be simulcast
to participating colleges and
universities around the country
from Seton Hall Law School. But
each participating institution
is free to omit or supplement
the simulcast to explore
whatever issues interest its
students and faculty. The
Project will also provide
support for as many efforts as
possible on participating
campus.
As for the
simulcast Teach-In, the
tentative program is below:
| Session One:
Opening Remarks |
10:00- 10:45 |
|
|
Welcome:
Mark P. Denbeaux
- Professor,
Seton Hall Law
School |
| |
Introduction:
Baher Azmy -
Professor, Seton
Hall Law School |
| |
Guantánamo: A
Primer on the
Administrations
Detention Policy
- Extraordinary
Rendition, CIA &
Military
Detention, and
Military
Commissions:
Joseph
Margulies, Esq.-
Clinical
Professor,
Northwestern
University
School of Law &
Author,
GUANTÁNAMO AND
THE ABUSE OF
PRESIDENTIAL
POWER |
|
| |
| Session Two:
Journalists Look Behind
the Wire |
10:45-12:00 |
| |
Moderator:
Jack Hit, The
New York Times &
Harper's
Magazine |
|
|
Jane Mayer -
Journalist, New
Yorker |
| |
Carol
Rosenberg -
Journalist,
Miami Herald |
| |
Adam Zagorin
- Journalist,
Time Magazine |
| |
Three renowned
journalists will
reflect on the
significance of
the
administration’s
detention
policy.
Moderated by
Jack Hitt, an
experienced
journalist and
lecturer, Ms.
Mayer, Ms.
Rosenberg and
Mr. Zagorin will
focus on the
ethical and
legal problems
facing the
media. The
ethical issues
focus on the
question of how
much to publish
and how much to
withhold. For
instance, should
the press
publish
news-worthy but
classified
documents
revealing the
manner in which
detainees are
treated during
interrogation?
On the other
hand, should the
press withhold
non-classified
news-worthy
information
because
revelation might
lead to
inflammatory
responses? Adam
Zagorin will
describe Time’s
efforts to deal
with this
problem, and the
other two
panelists bring
their own unique
perspectives to
bear on this and
related issues.
Jane Mayer has
written
extensively on
the
administration’s
detention
policy, and
Carol Rosenberg
has covered Camp
Delta longer
than any other
print
journalist. All
three panelists
will also
confront the
difficulties of
writing about
facilities they
are not
permitted to
visit, such as
Bagram,
Afghanistan,
which now holds
more prisoners
than Guantánamo. |
|
| |
| Habeas Interlude:
Force Feeding |
12:00-12:15 |
| |
Julia Tarver
Mason, Esq. -
Paul Weiss
Rifkind Wharton
& Garrison, LLP |
|
| |
| Session Three:
First, Do No Harm:
Medical Professionals
and Guantánamo |
12:15-1:30 |
| |
Moderator:
Brigadier
General (Ret.)
Dr. Stephen
Xenakis, M.D. |
| |
Leonard
Rubenstein -
Physicians for
Human Rights |
| |
Gerald Koocher,
Ph.D. -
President,
American
Psychological
Association |
| |
Jonathan
Marks -
Professor
Pennsylvania
State University |
| |
Military
physicians at
Guantánamo have
two very
different
functions: the
traditional role
of treating
those detained,
and the
nontraditional
role of
assisting the
administration
in obtaining
information from
the detainees
through
interrogations.
Physicians for
Human Rights
authored a
critically
important white
paper on the
psychological
impact of
coercive
interrogation
techniques in
the war on
terror, and its
Executive
Director,
Leonard
Rubenstein, has
been outspoken
about the role
of doctors and
mental health
professionals at
Guantánamo. By
contrast, the
American
Psychological
Association has
been more
receptive to the
administration’s
arguments, and
the President of
the APA, Dr.
Gerald Koocher,
will well
represent its
views. The third
panelist,
Jonathan Marks,
is a barrister
who has written
and spoken
widely on the
role of
physicians in
the war on
terror. The
three promise a
lively
discussion about
the proper role
of physicians
(and related
mental health
professionals)
in designing and
supervising
interrogations,
participating in
forced feeding
of prisoners
during a hunger
strike, and
intervening if
interrogations
become abusive.
Gen. Stephen
Xenakis will
moderate the
panel, drawing
on his personal
experience as a
military doctor. |
|
| |
| Habeas Interlude:
Insults to Religion
|
1:30-1:45 |
| |
Thomas
Wilner, Esq -
Shearman &
Sterling |
|
| |
| Concurrent
Sessions Four & Five |
|
| |
Session Four:
Matters of Faith:
Guantánamo and Religious
Communities (Concurrent
Sessions) |
|
1:45-2:45 |
| |
Moderator:
Ingrid Mattson,
Ph.D., Professor
of Islamic
Studies &
Director of
Islamic
Chaplaincy,
Hartford
Seminary |
| |
Captain
James Yee -
Author: FOR GOD
AND COUNTRY |
| |
Rev. George
Hunsinger -
Professor,
Princeton
Theological
Seminary |
| |
Rabbi
Michael Feinberg
- Executive
Director,
Greater New York
Labor-Religion
Coalition |
| |
There is a
deepening
conviction in
the Muslim and
Arab worlds that
the war on
terror is
actually a war
on Islam.
Despite the
administration’s
consistent
denial of such a
policy, this
perception is
fueled by
continuing
reports of
interrogators
using religious
and cultural
humiliation as
an interrogation
technique. At
the same time,
Islamic
extremists use
(or misuse) the
Qur’an to incite
anti-American
sentiment. The
three panelists
explore these
issues from a
faith
perspective,
illuminated
particularly by
Captain Yee’s
personal
experiences with
Guantánamo and
the failure of
the rule of law
there. Given the
unprecedented
role of religion
in this
conflict,
religious
communities may
have a
particular
obligation to
bear witness
against the
administration's
detention
policy. |
|
| |
| |
Habeas Interlude: Suicide |
|
2:45-3:00 |
| |
Joshua
Colangelo-Bryan,
Esq.- Dorsey &
Whitney |
|
| |
| |
Session Five:
American Detention
Policy: The Next
Frontier (Concurrent
Sessions) |
|
1:45-3:00 |
| |
Moderator:
Jonathan Hafetz,
Esq. - Brennan
Center for
Justice, NYU Law
School |
| |
Gitanjali
Gutierrez, Esq.
- Center for
Constitutional
Rights |
| |
John Sifton
- Human Rights
Watch |
| |
Margaret
Satterthwaite -
Professor, NYU
School of Law |
| |
Rasul v. Bush
rejected the
administration’s
core legal
argument that
the prisoners in
Cuba could be
held
indefinitely
without legal
process. But
while Rasul
altered the law,
it has yet to
change the
administration’s
practices. Long
before the
decision,
Guantánamo
ceased regularly
accepting new
detainees, and
facilities such
as Bagram Air
Base in
Afghanistan
began to grow.
Although
President Bush
has revived the
use of
Guantánamo by
transferring 14
prisoners there
for projected
trials by
military
commission,
other detention
centers remain.
Bagram now has
some 500
prisoners, and
additional
individuals are
held at forward
operating bases
throughout
Afghanistan.
Further,
“extraordinary
rendition”
continues
unabated, and
the
administration
shows no sign of
closing the
“black
sites”used by
the CIA. In
light of these
realities, how
should the bar
respond to the
second-generation
of post-9/11
detention
centers? John
Sifton, of Human
Rights Watch, is
an authority on
CIA secret
prisons and
detention
facilities in
Afghanistan;
Margaret
Satterthwaite is
one of the
leading
authorities on
extraordinary
rendition; and
Gitanjali
Gutierrez is an
attorney with
CCR, litigating
post-9/11
detainee rights
cases. The
moderator of
this panel,
Jonathan Hafetz,
with the Brennan
Center for
Justice at NYU,
is writing a
book to be
published by NYU
press on the
post-9/11 global
detention
system. |
|
| |
| Session Six: History of
Torture in the Modern
World |
3:00-4:15 |
| |
Moderator:
Joseph Margulies |
| |
John Conroy
- Journalist,
Chicago Reader,
&
Author:
UNSPEAKABLE
ACTS, ORDINARY
PEOPLE: THE
DYNAMICS OF
TORTURE |
| |
Alfred McCoy
- Professor,
University of
Wisconsin &
Author: A
QUESTION OF
TORTURE: CIA
INTERROGATION
FROM THE COLD
WAR TO THE WAR
ON TERROR |
| |
Walter
Pincus -
Journalist,
Washington Post |
| |
Craig Haney
- Professor,
University of
California,
Santa Cruz |
| |
Western
Democracies have
long confronted
the threat of
trans-national
terrorism. Our
panelists will
bring formidable
knowledge of how
government
responses to
terrorism bear
on the nation’s
reaction to what
is now called
“asymmetric
warfare.” John
Conroy, a
Chicago
journalist, is
the author of
Unspeakable
Acts, Ordinary
People, which
compares torture
by
counter-intelligence
agents in Israel
and Northern
Ireland to
torture by
Chicago police.
Walter Pincus a
senior
journalist with
the Washington
Post who has
covered
intelligence and
national
security issues
for decades; he
has written
widely on the
CIA’s secret
KUBARK Manual
used to train
its operatives
in coercive
counter-intelligence
interrogations
during the Cold
War. Professor
Alfred McCoy is
the author of A
Question of
Torture: CIA
Interrogation
from the Cold
War to the War
on Terror, which
traces the use
of interrogation
techniques
during the last
half-century.
Finally,
Professor Craig
Haney is
uniquely
qualified to
analyze the “bad
apple” defense,
the standard
response when
things go awry
in prisons such
as Guantánamo or
Abu Ghraib.
Professor Haney
was a designer
of the famous
Stanford prison
study in 1970,
which manifests
disturbing
similarities to
events at Abu
Ghraib.
|
|
| |
| Habeas Interlude:
Innocents at Guantánamo |
4:15-4:30 |
| |
Baher Azmy,
Professor, Seton
Hall University
School of Law |
|
| |
| Session Seven:
The Military and the
Commander in Chief |
4:30-5:45 |
| |
Moderator,
Ronald W.
Meister, Esq. - partner at Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York City |
| |
Rear Adm.
Donald Guter
(Ret.) - Dean
Duquesne Law
School |
| |
Commander
Charles Swift -
Counsel, Hamdan
v. Rumsfeld |
| |
Colonel
Dwight H.
Sullivan - USMC,
Chief Military
Defense Counsel,
Military
Commissions |
| |
Few principles
are more deeply
engrained in
American society
than the notion
of civilian
control over the
armed forces.
Senior military
planners in the
Pentagon, as
well as the top
officials at the
State
Department,
urged the
administration
to honor the
Geneva
Conventions and
not to endorse
aggressive
interrogations
in the war on
terror. What is
the ethical
obligation of
military
officers in this
context? This
lively panel
includes Dean
Donald Guter,
former JAG for
the Navy and who
worked in the
Pentagon on
9/11;
Lieutenant-Commander
Charles Swift,
one of the
lawyers for Mr.
Hamdan in
Hamdan v.
Rumsfeld;
and Col. Dwight
Sullivan, Chief
Military Defense
Counsel for the
Military
Commissions. It
will be
moderated by
Ronald W.
Meister, former
Military Judge,
United States
Navy. |
|
| |
| Habeas Interlude:
Voices of Guantánamo |
5:45-6:00 |
| |
Brent Mickum,
Esq. - Keller &
Heckman |
|
| |
| Closing:
Guantánamo and American
Foreign Relations |
6:00-7:00 |
| |
William H.
Taft, IV, Esq. -
Former Legal
Adviser, United
States
Department of
State, Of
Counsel, Fried,
Frank, Harris,
Shriver &
Jacobson LLP |
|
| |
|
Epilogue: Poetry from
Guantánamo |
| |
Read by:
Marc Falkoff,
Professor,
Northern
Illinois
University
College of Law |
|
|
|