Volume One    Spring 2005    Number One

FOREWORD Honorable Samuel A. Alito,
United States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
EDITOR'S NOTE Austin M. Berry

ARTICLES

PRECEDENT DIRECTION AND COMPLIANCE: HORIZONTAL  STARE DECISIS ON THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Emery G. Lee III
LEGAL FICTION OF THE “UNPUBLISHED” KIND: THE SURREAL PARADOX OF NO-CITATION RULES AND THE ETHICAL DUTY OF CANDOR J. Lyn Entrikin Goering
UNITED ARTISTS: REVIEWING THE CONSCIENCE SHOCKING TEST UNDER SECTION 1983 Clifford B. Levine, Esq.
& L. Jason Blake, Esq.
HOW THE NINTH CIRCUIT FARES IN THE SUPREME COURT: THE INTERCIRCUIT CONFLICT CASES Stephen L. Wasby
CURRENT CIRCUIT SPLITS Circuit Review Staff


COMMENTS

NO FINANCIAL INJURY NO PROBLEM: THE REDRESSABILITY OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS CLAIMS FOR WILLFUL VIOLATION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 362(H) Gregg S. Bateman
THE MCCONNELL COROLLARY: VAGUE LAWS MUST STILL TOE THE BUCKLEY EXPRESS ADVOCACY LINE Austin M. Berry
SAFE AIR FOR EVERYONE EXCEPT THE CITIZENS OF IDAHO: WHY THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S NARROW READING OF RCRA SHOULD BE OVERTURNED Michael L. Calder
NEITHER GOOD KNORR BAD: THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT’S DECISION TO ELIMINATE THE “ADVERSE INFERENCE” IN WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT DETERMINATIONS DOES NOT ALLEVIATE THE BURDEN ON ACCUSED PATENT INFRINGERS Ryan H. Coletti