Volume Thirty Four -- Book One

EXPERT ADMISSIBILITY SYMPOSIUM:
WHAT IS THE QUESTION? WHAT IS THE ANSWER? HOW SHOULD THE COURT
FRAME A QUESTION TO WHICH STANDARDS OF RELIABILITY ARE
TO BE APPLIED?
MAIN PAPER PRESENTATIONS: FRAMING THE QUESTION TO WHICH RELIABILITY STANDARDS ARE APPLIED
Expertise and the Supreme Court: What is the Problem? Ronald J. Allen
Kumho Tire and Expert Reliability: How the Question You Ask Gives the Answer You Get Mark P. Denbeaux &
D. Michael Risinger

COMMENTARIES AND QUESTIONS

An Embarrassing Episode in the History of the Law of Evidence John H. Mansfield
Eyes Wide Shut: Hidden Problems and Future Consequences of the Fact-Based Validity Standard Joëlle Anne Moreno
The Structure of Expertise in Criminal Cases Christopher Slobogin
Tenth Anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: The Respective Roles of Trial and Appellate Courts in Daubert-Kumho Rulings The Honorable John J. Gibbons
MAIN PAPER PRESENTATIONS: PROPER RELIABILITY STANDARDS FOR EXPERTISE NOT THE EXPLICIT PRODUCT OF SCIENCE
Expert Information and Expert Evidence: A Preliminary Taxonomy Samuel R. Gross &
Jennifer L. Mnookin
Reliability and the Admissibility of Experts Dale A. Nance

COMMENTARIES AND QUESTIONS

Expert Evidence in Flatland: The Geometry of a World Without Scientific Culture David L. Faigman
The Relativity of Reliability Edward J. Imwinkelried
Reliability Under Rule 702: A Specialized Application of 403 Calvin William Sharpe
The Limits of Cross-Examination James M. Shellow

COMMENTS

The Replying Game: Making the Case for Adopting the Fifth Circuit’s Use of Particularized Replies in § 1983 Actions Michael T.G. Long

© 2003 by the Seton Hall Law Review.  All rights reserved.